Darren Aronofsky is Not Changing his Process in Directing THE WOLVERINE

While out promoting the release of Black Swan, director Darren Aronofsky has also been busy answering questions about his next project: The Wolverine with Hugh Jackman.

wolverine_banner.jpg

David Poland of Movie City News recently spoke with Aronofsky. The director is very intent on making this movie in the same process as all of his other films which include the indie based hits The Wrestler, Requiem for a Dream, The Fountain along with the upcoming Black Swan. At one point in the interview he says "I'm being hired to do what I do."

Aronofsky says "I'm just trying to have fun." but later assures that: "We're definitely gonna make something great but it will be very different. That's what I do."

DarrenAronofsky_450x300.jpg

The second installment will see Logan (Hugh Jackman) in Japan and will loosely follow the popular Frank Miller and Chris Claremont mini-series. Wolverine will reportedly start out in a Canadian prison with an opportunity to get out if he goes to Japan. Silver Samurai and many other Japanese characters from the series are rumored to be in the film as well. At this point the script seems to conform to the series' storyline as Aronofsky states "There's not too much blowin shit up" when referring to the potential action sequences. There is a concerted effort at this point to distance the movie from any other previous film from the X-Men series.

"It's a stand alone piece that has nothing to do with anything in the franchise or in that universe."

Comments

Keven  |  Music Editor

Keven's picture

best news on this movie yet.

WeaponX

WeaponX's picture

Let's see if he's still talking like this when production is in full swing. FOX letting him do what he wants and sticking to his vision until the very end would be the first big surprise of this movie. As it stands, my expectations for this movie are so low that it'd have to look up to stare at a snake's asshole.

Boy October

Boy October's picture

I'm looking forward to this film because it's in his hands. I mean: what he's been saying about this film instills great hope in me...........though Fox may change their mind.

ckal

ckal's picture

This is the best chance we will ever get for an R rated Wolverine movie (at least while at Fox). If not R rated, it will probably be the closest to his personality we will see. I really would love to see a fierce animalistic berserker side to Wolverine.

gtrman

gtrman's picture

Aronofsky has only one chance to make this right, and that's if he sticks to who Wolverine is, not what previous directors and Jackman have turned him into. He's first and foremost, a killer, feral and unsympathetic. When Logan says he's the best there is at what he does, he doesn't mean consoling disenfranchised runaway teenagers on trains. He means cutting people down and not worrying about where the blood splatters. He's a murderer and enjoys it from time to time.

I'm not a big fan of Aronofsky. Any man that wears a scarf as part of an ensemble should be smacked notwithstanding, He literally has one opportunity here to reestablish this character because as far as I'm concerned, Wolverine has been pussified in the last three films he's been in. Origins made me sick, and the last two X-Men were laughable.

Upupandaway

Upupandaway's picture

Never really been a Wolverine fan. He's like that guy at the gym trying to show how buff he is. He's got frickin' claws for hands. He better be good at killing or hair.

fanboiii

fanboiii's picture

A Wolverine movie definitely has to have a lot of blood loss and bitter, rugged attitude. Hugh Jackman should slouch.

ckal

ckal's picture

@gtrman

Yeah, that pretty much sums it up right there. Wolverine has never been portrayed as the feral murderous beast he can be, and that is just plain sad.

Boy October

Boy October's picture
gtrman wrote:

Aronofsky has only one chance to make this right, and that's if he sticks to who Wolverine is, not what previous directors and Jackman have turned him into. He's first and foremost, a killer, feral and unsympathetic. When Logan says he's the best there is at what he does, he doesn't mean consoling disenfranchised runaway teenagers on trains. He means cutting people down and not worrying about where the blood splatters. He's a murderer and enjoys it from time to time.

I'm not a big fan of Aronofsky. Any man that wears a scarf as part of an ensemble should be smacked notwithstanding, He literally has one opportunity here to reestablish this character because as far as I'm concerned, Wolverine has been pussified in the last three films he's been in. Origins made me sick, and the last two X-Men were laughable.

My brother wears a scarf, man. So shut the hell up.

Interesting John  |  Web Developer

Interesting John's picture
Boy October wrote:
gtrman wrote:

Aronofsky has only one chance to make this right, and that's if he sticks to who Wolverine is, not what previous directors and Jackman have turned him into. He's first and foremost, a killer, feral and unsympathetic. When Logan says he's the best there is at what he does, he doesn't mean consoling disenfranchised runaway teenagers on trains. He means cutting people down and not worrying about where the blood splatters. He's a murderer and enjoys it from time to time.

I'm not a big fan of Aronofsky. Any man that wears a scarf as part of an ensemble should be smacked notwithstanding, He literally has one opportunity here to reestablish this character because as far as I'm concerned, Wolverine has been pussified in the last three films he's been in. Origins made me sick, and the last two X-Men were laughable.

My brother wears a scarf, man. So shut the hell up.

But does he also have a goofy mustache?

Boy October

Boy October's picture
Interesting John wrote:
Boy October wrote:
gtrman wrote:

Aronofsky has only one chance to make this right, and that's if he sticks to who Wolverine is, not what previous directors and Jackman have turned him into. He's first and foremost, a killer, feral and unsympathetic. When Logan says he's the best there is at what he does, he doesn't mean consoling disenfranchised runaway teenagers on trains. He means cutting people down and not worrying about where the blood splatters. He's a murderer and enjoys it from time to time.

I'm not a big fan of Aronofsky. Any man that wears a scarf as part of an ensemble should be smacked notwithstanding, He literally has one opportunity here to reestablish this character because as far as I'm concerned, Wolverine has been pussified in the last three films he's been in. Origins made me sick, and the last two X-Men were laughable.

My brother wears a scarf, man. So shut the hell up.

But does he also have a goofy mustache?

Nope. An Irish beard.

Interesting John  |  Web Developer

Interesting John's picture
Boy October wrote:
Interesting John wrote:
Boy October wrote:
gtrman wrote:

Aronofsky has only one chance to make this right, and that's if he sticks to who Wolverine is, not what previous directors and Jackman have turned him into. He's first and foremost, a killer, feral and unsympathetic. When Logan says he's the best there is at what he does, he doesn't mean consoling disenfranchised runaway teenagers on trains. He means cutting people down and not worrying about where the blood splatters. He's a murderer and enjoys it from time to time.

I'm not a big fan of Aronofsky. Any man that wears a scarf as part of an ensemble should be smacked notwithstanding, He literally has one opportunity here to reestablish this character because as far as I'm concerned, Wolverine has been pussified in the last three films he's been in. Origins made me sick, and the last two X-Men were laughable.

My brother wears a scarf, man. So shut the hell up.

But does he also have a goofy mustache?

Nope. An Irish beard.

Then he's 1 for 2 Tongue

fanboiii

fanboiii's picture